Canonical: https://uhl-services.ch/en/resources/ai-governance-starter-kit/
Language: en
Format: public page content, generated from HTML

# AI Governance Starter Kit for SMEs

Disclosure rules, approval workflows, prompt and asset registers, and data boundaries sized for a Swiss SME under FADP - governance without enterprise bureaucracy.

Reviewed by the UHL team · 27 October 2026

Starter kitUpdated 27 October 2026

[Download the PDF](https://uhl-services.ch/assets/resources/ai-governance-starter-kit-en.pdf?v=6c85a54dac9a)

## Governance that fits an SME

Enterprise AI governance assumes a compliance department. An SME has the same exposure - customer data in prompts, unreviewed output reaching customers, staff using unapproved tools - with none of the staff. This kit is a minimum viable policy: four documents and one habit, enough to answer 'what is our AI policy?' credibly in front of a customer or an auditor.

## Document one: acceptable use

- Approved tools list - which AI services staff may use for work, and which accounts (company-managed, not personal)

- Data classes - what may never enter a prompt: personal data of customers, credentials, unpublished financials, contract text of third parties

- Output rules - AI output is a draft; external-facing text, code and analysis requires human review before use

- Disclosure - when customers must be told AI contributed (support replies, assessments, generated media)

## Document two: the approval workflow

One named person approves: new tools, new use-cases for personal data, and anything AI-generated that leaves the company under the company name. The workflow is deliberately short - a request in writing, a yes/no with conditions, a line in the register. If approval takes more than a day, people route around it.

## Document three: the register

A single spreadsheet with three tabs answers most audit questions: tools in use (name, purpose, account owner, data classes allowed), prompts and templates in production use, and AI-assisted deliverables shipped to customers. It takes ten minutes a week to maintain and is the difference between 'we have governance' as a claim and as a fact.

## Document four: data boundaries

- Under FADP (the Swiss data protection act), personal data fed to an external AI service is a disclosure to a third party - document the legal basis or do not send it

- Prefer tools with contractual no-training terms for anything involving customer data

- Self-hosted inference is an option for sensitive workloads - it removes the third-party question entirely, at the cost of operating it properly

- Log retention: decide how long prompts and outputs are kept and who can see them

## The one habit

Quarterly, thirty minutes: review the register, confirm the tool list still matches reality, and re-issue the acceptable-use page to all staff. Governance that is not rehearsed is decoration.

- Acceptable-use page written and distributed

- Named approver for new tools and data uses

- Register exists: tools, prompts, shipped deliverables

- Data classes defined; customer data rules explicit

- Quarterly review scheduled

## Chat with UHL

Start a guided chat. The assistant asks a few questions and saves your enquiry for our team to review.

## Continue exploring

- [IT consultancy & managed services](https://uhl-services.ch/en/it-consultancy/)

- [Application security & staging audits](https://uhl-services.ch/en/security-assurance/)

## Let’s discuss your project.

[Talk to UHL](https://uhl-services.ch/en/contact/)
